I Have Master the Art of Politics by Saying a Lot of Words That Mean Nothing Bismark
The devious art of lying by telling the truth
(Image credit:
Getty Images
)
The line betwixt truth and lies is condign ever murkier, finds Melissa Hogenboom. There's fifty-fifty a word for a very unlike grade of lying.
I
It is no secret that politicians often lie, but consider this – they can do so merely by telling the truth. Dislocated?
That statement becomes clearer when y'all realise that we've probably all washed it. A archetype example might exist if your mum asks if yous've finished your homework and you respond: "I've written an essay on Tennessee Williams for my English language course." This may be true, but it doesn't really answer the question well-nigh whether your homework was done. That essay could have been written long agone and yous accept misled your poor mother with a truthful argument. You might not have even started your homework yet.
Misleading past "telling the truth" is then pervasive in daily life that a new term has recently been employed by psychologists to describe it: paltering. That it is so widespread in society now gives us more than insight into the greyness area between truth and lies, and maybe even why we lie at all.
Well-nigh of u.s. tell more than than 1 lie per day (Credit: Everett Collection Inc/Alamy)
We lie all the fourth dimension, despite the fact that it costs us considerably more mental effort to lie than to tell the truth. US president Abraham Lincoln once said that "no man has a good plenty retention to be a successful liar".
In 1996 one researcher, Bella DePaulo even put a effigy on it. She found that each of us lies about once or twice a mean solar day. She discovered this by asking participants for i calendar week to notation down each time they lied, even if they did and so with a practiced intention. Out of the 147 participants in her original study, only seven said they didn't lie at all - and we can merely gauge if they were telling the truth.
Many of the lies were fairly innocent, or fifty-fifty kind, such as: "I told her that she looked good when I thought that she looked like a blimp." Some were to hide embarrassment, such equally pretending a spouse had not been fired. DePaulo, a psychologist at the University of California Santa Barbara, says that the participants in her study were not aware of how many lies they told, partly because well-nigh were then "ordinary and and then expected that we just don't discover them".
Information technology is when individuals utilize lies to manipulate others or to purposely mislead that it is more worrying. And this happens more often than you might think.
The truth is non always what it seems (Credit: Chris Rout/Alamy)
When Todd Rogers and his colleagues were looking at how ofttimes politicians dodge questions during debates they realised something else was going on. Past stating some other truthful fact, they could get out of answering a question. They could even imply something was truthful when it was not. Politicians do this all the fourth dimension, says Rogers, a behavioural scientist at Harvard Kennedy School. He and colleagues therefore set out to sympathize more than virtually information technology.
He plant that paltering was an extremely common tactic of negotiation. Over one-half the 184 business organisation executives in his study admitted to using the tactic. The research besides institute that the person doing the paltering believed it was more ethical than lying outright.
The individuals who had been deceived, however, did not distinguish between lying and paltering. "Information technology probably leads to too much paltering as communicators recollect that when disclosed, it volition be somewhat ethical, whereas listeners see information technology as a lie," says Rogers.
Politicians commonly manipulate the truth (Credit: Getty Images)
Information technology is as well difficult to spot a misleading "fact" when we hear something that on the face of it, sounds true. For instance, the Uk's Labour Party entrada video to lower the voting age said: "Yous're sixteen. Now you can get married, join the Army, work total-fourth dimension." The BBC's reality check squad discovered that these facts exercise not tell the whole truth.
"You tin can just bring together the Army aged 16 or 17 with your parents' permission," the Reality Check squad wrote. "At that age you as well need your parents' permission to become married unless you exercise so in Scotland. Since 2013, sixteen and 17-yr-olds cannot piece of work full-time in England, merely can in the other three home nations with some restrictions."
In another example, the then-presidential-nominee Donald Trump paltered during the presidential debates. He was questioned about a housing discrimination lawsuit early in his career and stated that his company had given "no admission of guilt". While they may non have admitted it, an investigation by the New York Times found that his company did discriminate based on race.
And even if we do spot misleading truths, social norms can prevent us from challenging whether or non they are deceptive. Take a at present infamous interview in the UK, where journalist Jeremy Paxman interviewed the political leader Michael Howard (pictured below). He repeatedly asks Howard whether he "threatened to overrule" the then prisons governor. Howard in turn, continues to evade the question with other facts in a bizarre exchange that becomes increasingly awkward to watch. Non many of united states are comfy challenging someone in that way.
Paltering is a common negotiation tactic (Credit: BBC)
While it'due south common in politics, so too is it in everyday life. Consider the estate agent who tells a potential buyer that an unpopular property has had "lots of enquiries" when asked how many actual bids there have been. Or the used auto salesman who says a machine started up extremely well on a frosty forenoon, without disclosing that it broke downward the calendar week before. Both statements are true but mask the reality of the unpopular property and the dodgy auto.
Paltering is perhaps so commonplace because it is seen as a useful tool. It happens because nosotros constantly take and so many competing goals, suggests Rogers. "Nosotros want to accomplish our narrow objective – [selling a house or car] – but nosotros also desire people to run into us as ethical and honest." He says these two goals are in tension and by paltering, people believe they are being more ethical than outright lying. "Nosotros show evidence they are making a error," says Rogers.
We tin run into the issues this sort of thinking tin cause reflected in society today. The public are clearly sick of being lied to and trust in politicians is plummeting. I 2016 poll found that the British public trust politicians less than estate agents, bankers and journalists.
And despite the fact that we now frequently expect lies from those in power, it remains challenging to spot them in real time, especially and so if they lie past paltering. Psychologist Robert Feldman, writer of The Liar in Your Life, sees this equally worrying both on a personal and on a macro level. "When we're lied to past people in ability, it ruins our confidence in political institutions – it makes the population very cynical nigh [their] real motivations."
Lying can and does clearly serve a devious social purpose. It can help someone paint a better picture than the truth, or assistance a pol dodge an uncomfortable question. "It's unethical and information technology makes our democracy worse. But it's how homo cognition works," says Rogers.
Unfortunately, the prevalence of lies might stem from the way we are brought upwardly. Lies play a function in our social interactions from a very young age. We tell young children near tooth fairies and Santa, or encourage a child to exist grateful for an unwanted present. "We give our kids very mixed messages," says Feldman. "What they ultimately learn is that even though honesty is the best policy, it's also at times fine and preferable to lie about things."
And so next time you hear a fact that sounds odd, or someone to exist deflecting a question, be enlightened that what you think is the truth may very well be deceptive.
---
Melissa Hogenboom is BBC Future'southward characteristic author, she is @melissasuzanneh on twitter.
Join 800,000+ Future fans by liking us on Facebook , or follow us on Twitter .
If yous liked this story, sign upwardly for the weekly bbc.com features newsletter , called "If Yous Just Read 6 Things This Week". A handpicked pick of stories from BBC Future, Culture, Capital, and Travel, delivered to your inbox every Fri.
Source: https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20171114-the-disturbing-art-of-lying-by-telling-the-truth
0 Response to "I Have Master the Art of Politics by Saying a Lot of Words That Mean Nothing Bismark"
Post a Comment